|
13. Community
Leadership
|
Points to
cover
-
Democracy in the home is a
microcosm of democracy in the community.
-
To develop a community
properly, ordinary folk must care enough to educate
themselves to be skilled democratic leaders and team
players.
-
We must avoid the tendency
for leaders to become “executives”, out of touch with what
the community requires.
-
Democratic leadership
requires knowledge.
-
A true community leader is
willing to learn and grow and change positions based on new
information. His or her goal is to enable the community to
function without them.
|
Unpaid Leadership Most writings on
community organization assume that funds and professional workers
are available to supply paid health officers, paid recreation
managers, paid music program directors, etc. In small
communities this very often is not the case. Sometimes county,
state, or national funds may be supplied for specific purposes, but
in general if the small community is to have a well-proportioned
development, that must come about by the voluntary, unpaid work of
members of the community.
Especially for the
leaders, such voluntary work must be more than occasional short
undertakings. Some community members must become at least amateur
experts and specialists in their fields. One may become expert
in leading meetings and guiding discussions. Such a person
will not depend on common sense alone. He will find out what the
ablest men have thought and written about the subject of leadership.
He will read such books as The Art of Leadership, by Ordway
Tead, Sanderson’s Leadership for Rural Life, Follett's
The New State or her Creative Experience, and Walser's
The Art of Conference. Also, such a person will take
occasion to attend meetings directed by skilled leaders,
and will carefully observe their methods.
Good Community
Leadership Competent, prepared
leadership is necessary for good community development. Slavson, in
the book Creative Group Education, remarked, “Common
observation indicates that a group of average type, without any
leadership or with inadequate leadership, degenerates into a
destructive or petty-tyrannical group, with the stronger members as
the tyrants." (p.26) In many communities long
experience of living together, and the carryover of wise leadership
from the past, has resulted in mutual respect and good manners which
prevents this petty tyranny, or conflicts between would-be petty
tyrants. In some communities good leadership in the family
(called good breeding) and good community leadership have made such
an impression that the work of the community gets done with very
little evidence of personal dominance.
Quality over
Quantity If a few people in a
community will qualify themselves to be chairpersons of meetings and
leaders in community affairs they can raise leadership and habits of
cooperation in their community to new levels. A vast amount of
time can be saved at meetings; there can be greater order,
promptness, efficiency, and good will in getting things done.
As young people learn the methods of such leaders, the community in
the course of years may produce business leaders and
executives. In a relatively small business in a certain
American city the founder and owner of the business trained his
assistants so thoroughly in the art of administration and management
that as the years passed his company supplied more chief executives
to large American corporations than did probably any great American
corporation during the same period. Any small community in
which a few persons will thoroughly master the art of democratic
leadership may be making a very great contribution to that
community and to the country.
Leadership in a
community does not require striking personality or prominent
position. In the labor union movement some of the most
effective leaders are mechanics or office clerks or other people in
everyday positions. Any reasonably intelligent person can take
any little committee chairpersonship as his or her experimental
laboratory, and by reading up on methods of leadership, correcting
his or her own faults, observing good leaders when he or she has
opportunity, and by keeping at his or her little committee job until
he has done it thoroughly and well, can make himself or herself into
a more efficient leader than most people who now handle small
community affairs.
Spirit of Leadership Similarly in various
other special fields individuals may become specialists,
experts, and qualified leaders. Joseph K. Hart, in his Community
Organization, wrote, “Every human being needs some experience in
leadership. This is not only necessary; it is becoming definitely
possible.” (P. 210)
Sanderson in
Leadership for Rural Life wrote: (P.49)
"Not infrequently
persons of ordinary ability, who lack self-confidence, and who have
no experience as leaders, when they are encouraged to assume
positions of leadership and are given some concrete help or training
for it, develop into excellent leaders for specific groups. . . .
they become excellent leaders because of their devotion to a cause
in which they were sufficiently interested to try to learn how they
might help in its advancement."
“On the other hand,
there are many persons of undoubted ability who seem to have all the
qualifications for leadership, but who are unwilling to assume
its responsibilities, or who are so self-centered that groups will
not trust them as leaders.”
Motivation for
Leadership Very often a community
is greatly harmed by an itch for leadership which results in
competition and hard feeling, and which may undermine the
effectiveness of community action. It is not a craving for
recognition, position, authority or dominance that is helpful, but a
live interest in some work which needs to be done, a willingness to
take the trouble to understand the problem, and willingness to
assume the responsibility and the hard work of getting it
done.
Getting Qualified By the time one has
thoroughly qualified himself or herself to get a small piece of work
done well, the way generally will open for more important
work. In a small community a young woman, who has qualified
herself to lead a community music program, found the local program
firmly in the hands of an older person who had less useful
qualifications. The young woman gathered some young people of
high school age who were receiving little attention in the
community, and within a year or two had made this group the center
of the young life of the community, in addition to creating a
well-trained musical group. When opportunity came for her to
take over the community music program she hesitated to assume a
responsibility which would interfere with work that had come to be
both useful and pleasant.
Ordway Tead, in his book
The Art of Leadership remarked very truly, “The opportunity
to lead fairly shouts aloud for its chance in every organization and
institution which brings the citizens of a democratic community
together. For in every area of action people are seeking to
fulfill themselves. They want deeply to rise above a nominal or
legal equality to an assertion of their own intrinsic superiorities
of capacity and achievement. But to do this they have to be
led. They have to be brought into effective group relationships
which are certainly not spontaneous, but the creation of those in
the vanguard.” (P.268)
Beginnings of
Democracy Democracy is one of the
hardest lessons humanity has to learn. It must begin in the
home. Husband and wife must be partners, each one the leader
in some matters and the follower in others. Children should
share in responsibilities to the full extent that they are able, for
otherwise they will never be truly democratic, but will either
become dictators, or people seeking someone to manage them. In the
same way, community responsibility must be widely distributed and
widely shared if community democracy is to be a reality. Unless
there is democracy in the community there will be little in the
nation.
Transitioning to
Democracy The habits of feudalism
and autocracy, which were so deeply imbedded in the old world, were
not escaped in the settlement of America. The new world could not
have lived comfortably without those old habits, because
the new habits of democracy had not yet fully developed. The
transition to democracy, which is a very difficult process, can best
take place in the small community where it already has roots from
the distant, pre-feudal past. Joseph K. Hart, in his
Community Organization, pictures the difficulty of this
transition: (pp. 207-209)
“Democracy needs a
completely new organization of the technique of administration,
which will be consistent with the factors and the aims which a
democratic community seeks to achieve. Democracy requires
leadership. Autocratic bossing of the job is not real leadership. It
may be ‘executive ability' but if so it is an ability to 'execute'
the aspirations of democracy, to suppress them, and discourage and
destroy them, rather than to lead them. All too long democracy has
had to fight against these unsympathetic attitudes of the typical
administrator. One phase of the work of the deliberative community
council should be the more complete analysis of the kind of
leadership and administration which the democratic community must
have."
“The most real difficulty in our present
world-unrest arises out of the fact that our community interests,
international, national and local, are still largely dominated by
'executives' who have not the
slightest comprehension of the suppressed energies they are dealing
with or the ideal demands toward which those energies are aspiring.
The industrial leader, the political boss, the typical educator, the
traditional theologian - all bear the taint of this lack of
democracy. They are all impatient of deliberation, and of the vague
longings of the suppressed multitudes. The more definitely they urge
their programs upon present conditions, however, the more they
alienate and disaffect those whom they are supposed to
lead.”
“The first task of the
democratic leader should be to become really acquainted with the
forces and energies that he is to lead. This involves going far
below the conventional surface of things. Democracy demands that
every normal individual shall be taken into account and the
community leader must be one who can do this democratic accounting.
He must be able to help those long-lost forces and energies recover
from their old repressions and discover their capacity to express
themselves in order that a program or policy for the community shall
actually come out of the vital life of that community.”
The democratically
minded leader in the community will find that he cannot always wait
for results until he has educated his or her people in the spirit of
democratic responsibility. He or she will find many of them inert,
disinterested - concerned with their own affairs. Men
and women who are competent in their own fields see the fundamental
social economy of giving a leader full authority in a field where he
or she is competent. Too much deliberation and participation may
wreck a program as surely as too little.
Managing Community
Affairs No universal rules can
be made for the democratic management of community affairs.
Sometimes a program of necessary work may be delayed or killed by
waiting too long on democratic participation. Sometimes it is
necessary for the community leader to “take the bit in his teeth,”
and get the job done in a somewhat autocratic manner. Sometimes the
seemingly quick results of such methods do not last, or are not
effective, because the people have not had enough part in the
undertaking to become interested, because they have not been
educated to carry it on, because they resent the autocratic methods
used, or because the leader, in his haste to get results, has failed
to understand the problem as some of the people did who seemed to be
obstructing his program. In choosing his or her methods the
leader must be guided by his or her common sense, by the best
counsel available, by a willingness to learn and to change his or
her opinion, and by persistence and firmness against discouragement
or blind opposition. He or she should be on guard constantly against
a desire to be conspicuous, to dominate, to gain recognition and
power. His or her aim should be to learn what the community needs
and how he or she can be most helpful in meeting these needs. He or
she will go as far as possible toward making himself or herself
unnecessary or unimportant by helping his or her associates to
develop the capacity to carry on without him or her. This will
free time and attention for pioneering, if he or she has it
inside.
|
Questions
-
List the qualities of a
democratic leader. Which do you think are inherent? Which
must be learned?
-
Would you ever choose to be
a leader? Why or why not? Is there something you are so
passionate about that you would take a leadership role in
it?
-
How can family life reflect
the quality of community life?
-
Would you rather be a
community leader yourself or hire someone from outside the
community to do the same function. Why?
-
List three democratic
leaders in history you admire? Why?
|
|