|
Car
and Community
In the
fall of 2002, I began shopping for a used car in Yellow Springs, Ohio. While
talking to the owner of one of the cars I evaluated, I asked why he was
replacing it. He laughingly said he had bought a new “politically
correct” Honda Civic Hybrid. I had noticed several gas/electric hybrids in
Yellow Springs, including a Honda Insight, driven by a neighbor, and three
Toyota Prisms, driven by members of the Vale, an intentional community with
which CIS is associated. Since I now knew the locations of four such hybrids,
and have seen others about town, it struck me that Yellow Springs seemed to
have a high percentage - that is at least 5 hybrids in a population of 4000.
Applying
the same ratio to the total population of 280,000,000 in the country, one
would expect to find 370,000 such vehicles in the country. Yet the actual
sales numbers for the country are less than 10% of this number. The Insight
has been selling at the rate of about 4000 yearly and the Prism about 12,000
yearly. Of course, with annual auto sales of 15 million in the country,
hybrid sales are an infinitesimal 1/10 of 1% of total sales.
The
Honda Insight is the latest development by Honda, continuing a line of highly
efficient automobiles. It is noteworthy to see the development of fuel
efficiency of Honda cars in less than a decade. The 1991 Honda Civic Hatch
back DX weighed 2158 pounds and its gas mileage (city/highway) combination
was 31/35. The 1992 Honda Civic VX hatchback weighed 2100 pounds and its gas
mileage was 48/55. This amazing increase was based on a
new VTEC-E engine, which utilized a finely timed valve control system and new
lean-burn combustion technology. This was the only car in California that did
not require a catalytic converter. In 1999 the Honda Insight was delivered which weighed 1847
pounds with mileage of 61/68. This represented a doubling of gas mileage in
Honda’s smallest car in less than a decade.
Honda
also developed the Civic GX natural gas vehicle, which went on sale in 1998, as
well as an electric car, the EV
Plus, which was announced in 1996. Honda leased
276 of these vehicles in two years in the Los Angeles and San Francisco areas
as well as a few in New York City. A total of 320 of these cars were
built. A few years ago the EV Plus was cancelled although existing
owners of the car can lease it until the end of 2002.
Another electric car was General Motors’ EV1 electric car, announced in
late 1996. GM terminated the program in early 2000. About
500 EV1s were built and were leased mostly in California and Arizona. GM
spent $350 million to develop and promote the car. GM will recall all the
cars by the end of 2002. In August 2002 Ford
Motor Co. stopped work on its Think electric vehicle. Ford had bought Norway-based Think in 1999 for $23 million
and had invested $100 million in electric vehicle battery technology before
canceling the project.
Honda
announced the FCX-V1 and FCX-V2 hydrogen fuel cell test vehicles in September
1999, followed by the 4-passenger FCX-V3 test vehicle in September 2000. In
2001, the 4th-generation FCX-V4 was announced. Both the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) have
certified these hydrogen-powered Honda FCX cars as meeting all applicable
standards. The FCX has been certified by CARB as a Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV)
and by the EPA as a Tier-2 Bin 1, National Low Emission Vehicle (NLEV), the
lowest national emission rating. The FCX will also meet applicable U.S.
safety and occupant protection standards, featuring improved performance and
collision safety. The car weight is 3,836lbs. The initial models for testing
will be delivered in late 2002.
There
are many other cars available today which are competitive with Honda that
provide high gas mileage. The top ten cars for 2001 in terms of gas mileage
are:
1. Honda Insight (electric-gas hybrid) 61/68
2. Toyota Prius (electric-gas hybrid) 52/45
3. (3-way tie) Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Jetta, Volkswagen New
Beetle
(all diesels with manual transmissions) 42/49
4. Honda Civic HX (manual) 36/44
5. Suzuki Swift 36/42
6. Honda Civic HX (automatic) 35/40
7. (3-way tie) Volkswagen Jetta, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen New
Beetle
(all diesel with automatic transmission) 34/45
8. Toyota Echo 34/41
9. (2-way tie) Chevrolet Prizm, Toyota Corolla 32/41
10. Honda Civic Sedan 32/39
Cars
are the most resource-intensive machines of our modern lives.
Energy is used to produce the steel, rubber, and components of a motor
vehicle, which then consumes more during its duration of use. Since cars use
huge amounts of a non-renewable resource (oil), there is great pressure to
make them more efficient.
Car
manufacturers like Honda have responded by developing a wide range of
options, both in size and in fuel types from gasoline to natural gas to
electric to fuel cells. In many parts of the world, there are even more
efficient cars available.
Yet
despite the availability of alternatives and in spite of the knowledge of
depleting oil resources, the most popular cars in America are the largest
cars – the Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV). Despite their proven dangers to
people in smaller cars, despite their grossly poor gas mileage, Sport Utility
Vehicle sales continue to increase. Recently Congress defeated a measure
calling for improved mileage efficiency requirements for new cars.
Repeated
surveys say that Americans are not willing to sacrifice performance and
features for better fuel economy. The
only features that count now are opulence and size. “Soccer moms” and “suburban warriors”, terms used to
describe the typical SUV driver,
are picking size and weight, along with acceleration and comfort, as their
main reasons for buying. Some report they feel “safer”, ignoring the fact
that the safer they feel, the less safe other drivers feel.
President
Bush has announced that the war on terrorism will last decades. Some of those
viewed as enemies are centered in oil producing countries in the Middle East.
Many people think the real basis of the conflict is oil resources. Yet
reliable cars that get 3 times the gas mileage of SUVs have been available
for years. Are people ready to attack and occupy other countries simply to
drive a larger vehicle?
Does
Yellow Springs’ high concentration of hybrid cars tell us anything? Does
“community spirit” enter into it, in the form of concern for future
generations as far as resources or with existing members of the community
relative to safety? One thinks of people considering their neighbors and the
children of their neighbors and themselves; and then making selections based
on that, rather than style, prestige and performance.
Or
is it something even simpler and less altruistic? I have noticed that people
in Yellow Springs are not impressed by big cars, quick acceleration, elegant
homes, and a host of other material possessions that we take for granted in
larger urban areas. They are very practical people. Big cars and big houses
are of low priority. What is significant to them are the relationships within
the community and the community itself. It seems that they perceive
themselves not as individuals, attempting to compete or outdo their neighbors
(particularly in appearance) but as members of a community where the most
important activities are those concerning interpersonal interactions. Their
choice of high mileage cars results from perceiving themselves also as
members of a national or world community. When people have friends who care
for them and for whom they care, and with whom they live in close trusting
communities, cars and houses are incidental. When their life is full of
interactions, they have no need for shopping at the mall. When they are
impressed with each other because of character and involvement, they pay no
attention to styles. They have happiness without “material stuff” and
their lives are full and meaningful.
|